Журналы →  CIS Iron and Steel Review →  2017 →  №2 →  Назад

IT Technologies
Название Link analysis of Iranian steel industry (ISI), using web impact factor (WIF) and clustering method
DOI 10.17580/cisisr.2017.02.09
Автор As. Asemi, F. Rahimi, Ad. Asemi
Информация об авторе

University of Isfahan (Isfahan, Iran):

Asemi As., Ph. D., Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, asemi@edu.ui.ac.ir

 

Isfahan University of Technology (Isfahan, Iran):
Rahimi F., MLIS, Librarian, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, (IUT), rahimi22@yahoo.com

 

Higher Education Institute of Safahan (Isfahan, Iran):
Asemi Ad., Ph. D., Faculty of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, ad_asemi@yahoo.com

Реферат

In this paper, ISI Websites are identified and they studied based on the Webometrics methods. The survey aimed to investigate visibility, WIF and the collaboration rate of ISI Websites. In this process in-links, selflinks and co-links of the Websites were studied and after analysis the Websites clustered and categorized. Webometric methods are applied and all of the links were analyzed including in-links, Self-links, co-links, number of each Web pages, total WIF and Revised WIF (RWIF). Data collection of 47 ISI Websites was done during March 29 to April 17. The results show that Esfahan Steel Company (ESCo.) Website with 2346 in links was the most visited Website and Shahrood Steel Company (ShSCo.) Website, with 1 in-link had the lowest rate of visibility. Also, Azarbaijan Steel Company (ASCo.) Website, with143 total WIF had the highest rate and Meybod Steel Company (MSCo.) Website with 0.31 total WIF had the lowest rate. On the other hand, ASCo. Website, with 143 rate in this case made the most RWIF and ShSCo. Website, with 0.05 was the last one. In this study 11 Websites were declared as the core Websites. Also colink analysis results indicated that Websites under study had collaborated in 8 clusters. It is concluded that Website managers and designers outline plans need to improve the quality and content of their Websites and recognizing the factors required by the Website in order to attract links. The final success of a Website is dependent on factors such as quality, size, language, history, content and some other factors and one or two restricted factors cannot be declared as sole reasons for its success. Therefore any research in this field must consider all factors.

Ключевые слова Webometrics, Iranian steel industry, web impact factor, website visibility, link analysis, revised web impact factor
Библиографический список

1. Soheili F. An Analysis of the Links among the Websites of nanotechnology: Using Webometrics methods. [Dissertation in Persion]. Ahvaz. Chamran University. 2006.
2. Pelark H. (2011). Steel Output Capacity To Hit 46m Tons. Interview with Iran Daily Newspaper. Available at: http://www.iran-daily.com/1389/10/15/MainPaper/3863/Page/4/Index.htm#. 15 January 2011.
3. Ingwersen P., Almind T. Informetic analysis on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to Webometrics. Journal of documentation. 1997. Vol. 53. pp. 404–426.
4. Smith A.G. ANZAC Webometrics: exploring Australasian Web structures, Proceedings of Information Online and On Disc, 1999. Vol. 99. pp. 15-18. Available at: http://www.csu.edu.au/special/online99/proceedings99/203b.htm.
5. Chu H. A Webometric analysis of ALA accredited LIS school Websites. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Sydney. 2001. 16-20 July. pp 117–126.
6. Vaughan L., Hysen, K. Relationship between links to journal Web sites and Impact Factors. Aslib proceedings, 2002. Vol. 54(6). pp. 356–361.
7. Osareh F. Mapping the structure of library and information schools (LIS) Websites. Using cluster and multidimensional. 9th International conference on Scientmetrics and Informations, Beijing. 2003. 25–29 August.
8. Vaughan L. Web Hyperlinks Reflect Business Performance: A Study of US and Chinese IT Companies. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Sciences. 2004. Vol. 28. pp.17.
9. Chu H. Taxonomy of in-linked Web entities: What does it imply for Webometric research? Library and Information Science Research. 2005. 27(1). Winter. Vol. 8–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2004.09.002.
10. Noruzi A. Web Impact Factors for Iranian Universities. Webology. 2005. Vol. 2(1). Available at: http://www.webology.ir/2005/v2n1/a11.html.
11. Vaughan L., Thelwall M. A modeling approach to uncover hyperlink pattern: The case of Canadian universities. Information Processing and Management. 2005. Vol. 41(2). pp. 347–359.
12. Chu H., He S., Thelwall M. Library and information science schools in Canada and USA: A Webometric perspective. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 2002. Vol. 43(2), pp. 110– 125.
13. Ingwersen P. The calculation of Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation. 1998. Vol. 54(2). pp. 236–243. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007167.
14. Smith A., Thelwall M. Web impact factors and university research links. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on International Society for Scientometrics and Informatics. Sydney. 2001. Vol. 2. pp. 657–664.
15. Vaughan L., Thelwall M. Scholarly use of the Web: What are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? Journal of the Associationy for Information Science and Technology. 2003. Vol. 54(1). pp. 29–38.
16. Kim H. J. Motivations for hyperlinking in scholarly electronic articles: A qualitative study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2000. Vol. 51(10) pp. 887–899.
17. Ortega J. L., Augillo I., Cothey V., Scharnhorst A. Maps of the academic Web in the European Higher Education Areaan exploration of visual Web indicators. Scientometrics. 2008. Vol. 74(2). pp. 295–308.
18. Xian-huang M. A. The Link Analysis on Websites of Universities Libraries in USA: Taking Websites of Thirty Universities libraries in USA as an Example. The Journal of the Library Science in Jiangxi. 2008. No. 2. Available at: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-JXTS200802058.htm.
19. Jalal S. K., Biswas S. Ch., Mukhopadhyay P. Web impact factor and link analysis of selected Indian universities. ALIS. 2010. Vol. 57(2). pp. 109–121.
20. Ming-dong L. Research on Chinese University Archive Websites Based on Link Analysis and the Measure of Web Impact Factor. 2010. Journal of Library and Information Sciences in Agriculture. Vol. 10. CateGory Index G270.7.
21. Maharana R. K., Panda K. C., Sahoo J. Web Impact Factor (WIF) and Link Analysis of Indian Institute of Technologies (IITs): A Webometric Study. 2012. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). No. 789. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/789.
22. Jeyshankar R. Link analysis and web impact factor of Indian Nationalised Banks. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology; Ambala. 2011. Vol. 1(3). pp. 171–179.
23. Alizadeh Zavarem A, Pooya A. Evaluating and clustering the Iranian banks and financial institutions based on website traffic indicators [Persian]. Pagoohesh-haye Modiriyat Manabee Ensani. 2017 . Vol. 7(1). pp. 189–206.
24. Wimaladharma I., Herath M. An analysis of significance of Revised Web Impact Factor for ranking the websites of state universities in Sri Lanka. IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation for Sustainability (ICIAfS). 2016, 16–19 Dec. Galle, Sri Lanka. 2017. DOI: 10.1109/ICIAFS.2016.7946521.
25. Verma M. K., Brahma K. A webometric analysis of National Libraries’ websites in South Asia. ALIS. 2017. Vol. 64(2). pp. 116–124.
26. Thelwall M. Web use and peer interconnectivity metrics or academic Web sites. Journal of Information Science. 2003. Vol. 29(1). pp. 1–10.

Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад